on how the past is still there

To expand on the ‘how time is still there’ document.

We first imagine that the universe we are in has a smallest part, just under the size of the plank length which is the smallest division possible. This is the ‘resolution’ of our universe as anything smaller than that cannot be directly ‘seen’, however the outcome of a probability field(s) in the zone which is smaller than the plank length can be determined by the state of that quanta at it’s current time. That is to say we are imagining that our universe can only get so small, and that there is a unit which exists just below that size which we cannot probe, only measure. At this scale things either are, or are not. And everything in the universe is created out of this binary-ness. All fields are created due to the size and shape and time frame of these possible choices and the smaller fields create larger fields and mass that we call home.

Next we imagine that it is possible to view a 3D world / universe completely on a 2D screen. This metaphorical screen you can imagine like a TV monitor that can zoom in and out at all scales and view anything, from any angle, anywhere in the entire universe. The screen looks like you’re viewing one side of a sphere. When viewing this screen you see the target, what you are looking at, in the center of the screen. The things to the side of your target are further away and curved, everything exists within the edges of the screen if you scroll to that thing.

We further imagine that such an ability exists in the greater-universes to view a 2D screen as a 1D line which we will call the Z axis We are then going to take our 3D universe, display it’s total contents on a 2D layer, then translate that into a one dimensional line. Each quanta, or smallest particle which is just below the limit of impossibility, which we can call a modulation unit, perturbation block, deciding quanta, manipulation point, decision dot, or maybe more accurately time-space atom. Every time space atom or TSA exists both as time in one dimension and space in an orthogonal dimension. We will take every TSA in our universe and display it in a line. The TSAs in the line are arranged in a way which can be directly translated to view our universe through the 2 dimensional conversions.

You can see any thing in the entire universe on the metaphorical screen and that item is at the center of the screen, what you doing at that point is focusing your attention on a single TSA and setting it to zero (0) in your observation. In the 1D line above, which represents all of the universe as we know it, each TSA is assigned a place on the line.

Each TSA is either one way which we will call Left or the other way which we will call Right. We cannot see any difference in the TSA beyond if it interacts like it is Left or if it is Right. As many TSAs are near each other in 3D space the interaction of the TSAs which are Left vs Right creates the fields that we understand and in turn create the mass as we know it through the strong nuclear force.

So we have this 1D line, the Z-axis, of all things in the universe where each TSA, or smallest possible piece of the universe, is in an order and that order can be translated in a way that makes it possible for a 3D universe like ours to be represented perfectly. Each number in the number line has a binary representation, a 1/0; on/off; left/right; etc. This creates a Complex Numberline where each entire universe can be captured by the numbers from infinity to positive infinity and their corresponding values. And different Complex Numberlines (CNs) will translate to different universes.

Let’s imagine a number line like we are used to. With now being 0 and the past being negative time numbers and positive side of the X axis being future. Or at least past to the left and future to the right.

Events happen in a linear fashion across the time line. We want to look at the Y axis on this timeline graph by examining each possibility in the entire universe.

On this timeline each whole number is a plank second, or just below it. For each t# on the CN t each TSA is in one of two states. At the next time period t#+1 the CN duplicates an infinite number of times, in each of these CNs there is only one number which has changed state. This new iteration of the CN is placed on the Y axis of the timeline.

Now we have an X, Y, and Z axis for spacetime. We here want to imagine that we have a time line going left to right on the X axis, with the possible iterations of that time line going up and down on the Y axis, and that this is happening separately for each of the smallest possible units in the universe which we call TSAs, and that in our timeline graph each of those TSAs is represented by a spot on the Z axis. We want to turn our view so that we are viewing one moment in time (as a slice we are viewing on a flat screen), across all the possibilities (up and down), and for each TSA (left and right). As time goes on there is a new slice that goes on the top of the one we were looking at. But since there is an infinite number of new universes created from each TSA the size of the graph grows dramatically. We then zoom out at the same rate, so that when we focus on one TSA over time it stays the same size in our view.

———————————————————————————————————

The state of this unit of space will influence all its neighbors.

|P1

When we view any TSA we are viewing the entire universe head on on the half sphere, and see around it the TSAs which are next to it on the number line, -do we? We don’t actually know how the 2D to 1D visualization would work so that may not be true

|P3

TSAs don’t have to stay in the Z axis time line where they were, they can move around via math. So time may change across different locations in the line depending on which line you have and even what time it is within that line. The math from the interactions of each TSA with every other TSA in their 2D plane and also the 3D space made of their surrounding planes can help determine the outcome of the probability matrix which leads to the time flower.

|P4

What about when you zoom your focus out and observe a molecule or complex interaction made of a great many TSAs?

|P4

When you observe any TSA, that is point in the universe your focus is on, then that point is set to 0 in you calculation. Each point always sets itself to 0 in it’s own regard, the numbers of the TSA near it calculated differently and individually for each TSA. The numbers exists as these 1D lines and since they go on forever and each TSA has it’s own number line where it is 0 then is math the most pure form of the universes existence, and math has rules; so there could be entire other probability trees on ever growing spheres based on the end fate of this universe which may be able to be affected by life in that universe. Maybe there is a whole new universe for each TSA at each time scale where we determine if it’s one way or the other way and that

|P4

Do negative numbers on the 1D number line mean there is a negative universe where matter and anti matter are switched, which exists simultaneously with our own at all times?

|P5

Depending on which number (f) is represented by which value we can translate into different representations of

|P6

Each TSA has their own CN where that specific TSA is set to 0, and are most tangent to the time flower half sphere

|P6

By setting any of the infinite numbed TSAs to zero in our observation we have the CN change based on the relative impact of each neighboring TSA, that is, each other number on the number line. And as there are infinite numbers there are also infinite universes and they are represented by the infinite CNs

|P6

‘Now’ is set to 0 in the time line.

|P7

We want to plot the possibility of everything from a starting time, t0, and I mean to plot the possibility of every possible iteration in the entire universe. We will then represent all the possibilities of everything in the universe as a 2D layer on the viewing half sphere, and at each time t+1 etc we will put the new layer as close as possible to the layer before and so on. Over time this builds a 3D half sphere, where it’s not just which area you turn to across the surface, but also how deep you zoom in or out and into which part. This hyperspace may have living beings and ecosystems beyond our understanding or even imagination, including parasites and potential helpers.

|P7

A side effect of this is that each unit in timespace, the time space atom, TSA has it’s own time coefficient that changes depending on where it is in space and where it is being observed from. Any calculation of mass of any object should incorporate the integral of the time coefficient of that mass (collection of TSAs) over the time period in question.

|P7

We can only make determinations as to the state of things every plank second, and anything that happened between that time, if anything, cannot ever be probed by us beyond our observation of the state of things before and after the time of this plank second

|P8

I wonder if there is a relativity type effect of number assigned to TSAs beyond their own light cones.

|P8

For each TSA set to 0 we will copy the CN and change the Left/Right value of one single number in the infinite CN. Or would we only change the CN value of every iteration of the number line where each numbered particle is set to 0?

|P7

So we can see the probability outcome of any time TSA which expands (a bigger infinity) to the second power on the Y axis of the spacetime continuum.

The two copies of the universe split apart as now their CNs are one number off. Each of these universes, as that is what they are, different universes where one single quanta of the smallest possible amount has changed, goes on to the future to see what happens next. So at every possible moment we are creating an infinite number of new universes for every possible change across the entire universe.

|P8

and a way to represent the expansion of the time flower.

|P9

I think that these universes might merged back together, with the parts that are the same sticking and being stronger, where the skinny parts of low probability that branch off and have less support from matching and other universes are more likley to die out

|P9

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *